- NAD+ formats
- Injection, nasal spray and cream listed
- Injection entry offer
- $119 first month, then $186/month; 500 mg three-month option
- Nasal entry offer
- $112 first month, then $127/month; three-month option
- Service model
- Independent licensed clinician assessment
- Included services
- Doctor visit, medication and shipping described as included
Read the collection as separate offers
Eden presents a collection of NAD+ products rather than one uniform plan. Injection pricing varies with the listed vial amount and the selected plan length; nasal spray has its own first-month and later prices. The catalog also includes a topical cream, which we do not combine with injectable or nasal costs. A single lowest-price badge would obscure these important distinctions.
Our comparison uses the published entry options and names the conditions attached to them. The amount a patient actually pays still depends on the selected offer and clinician-approved prescription, so a final quote remains essential.
The injection matrix changes the budget
The 500 mg three-month option is advertised at $119 for the first month, then $186 per month. The monthly option for that quantity displays $173 initially and $196 afterward. The listed 1,000 mg choices carry different prices again. Those figures make clear that the plan selector changes more than the timing of a discount.
A longer plan may show a lower monthly equivalent while requiring a different initial payment. Ask for the exact amount charged now and the dates of later charges. The website's monthly wording should not be treated as proof that every three-month option is collected in monthly installments.
Nasal pricing should stay in its own column
For nasal spray, the three-month option displays $112 for the first month and $127 per month afterward. A monthly selection shows $120 initially and $135 subsequently. A reader considering that route therefore needs a different cost schedule from someone considering injections.
The practical comparison also needs bottle information, the pharmacy's instructions and the prescription's refill expectations. A lower displayed monthly price cannot establish equivalent exposure or equivalent clinical results across routes. Route-specific records keep a price comparison from becoming an unsupported medical comparison.
Included care and its limits
Eden says its plans include the doctor's visit, medication and free shipping, and it advertises provider messaging. It also identifies the clinical decision as the responsibility of independent licensed providers. These statements help explain the service model without guaranteeing approval or a particular prescription for every applicant.
Clarify whether any suggested additional testing is included in the selected NAD+ plan and where clinical records will be available. A general statement about no hidden fees should be reconciled with the written order, especially when changing products or adding another service.
What an informed selection looks like
Eden's public prices are useful because they expose more than one stage of a promotion. They are less useful if the reader remembers only the lowest initial number. Keep a record of route, vial or bottle selection, plan duration, first payment and recurring payment together. That combination identifies the actual offer being compared.
The collection's vitality and cognitive claims remain marketing claims. Product format, individualized suitability and evidence are separate questions from whether a subscription is affordable. Before enrolling, review cancellation timing, medication processing and the named dispensing pharmacy so a low introductory payment does not become the only basis for the decision.
Useful distinctions
- Initial and subsequent prices are publicly separated
- Multiple plan lengths can be compared
- Visit, medication and delivery described as included
Limitations to weigh
- The lowest price requires a particular plan selection
- Billing frequency must be confirmed for longer plans
- Prices across different routes do not indicate equivalent benefit
Sources & further reading
Official pages and evidence consulted for this article. Checked October 11, 2026. Provider pages establish advertised terms; they do not independently establish effectiveness.